It is becoming increasingly apparent that fossil fuels represent a substantial risk that should make investors wary. Fossil fuel reserves, including oil, gas and coal will be rendered obsolete in the coming decades, leaving investors holding valueless investments. A plethora of peer reviewed science tells us the curbing fossil fuel use is key to climate mitigation.
From widespread calamitous coastal flooding to devastating extreme weather events the need to urgently act on climate change has finally been accepted by every nation on earth. The economics of climate action is sound. A cost benefit analysis reveals the overwhelming logic. We must the eradication of fossil fuels as soon as possible. The impetus to act on climate change, once dismissed by some, is now a fact of life for all thinking people.
Showing posts with label Big Oil. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Big Oil. Show all posts
Monday, April 25, 2016
Thursday, February 4, 2016
Diminishing Profits Signal the Beginning of the End of Oil
Oil is dying. Low oil prices are erasing profits and setting into motion a death spiral from which fossil fuels will not recover. Big Oil is cutting costs, and scaling back production, this results in smaller returns and diminished investor confidence. The addition of carbon pricing schemes and the elimination of subsidies will ultimately inflate prices and reduce demand.
____________________________
____________________________
Thursday, January 21, 2016
Oil is a Bad Investment
Iinvestors can no longer avoid the realization that their fossil fuel holdings are fraught with risks. While there are many factors at play, the 18 month slide and low price forecasts combine to make the point that investing in oil makes no economic sense.
In the short term China's slowing growth and the glut of oil are driving down the price. The situation will be exacerbated by the lifting of sanctions allowing Iran to sell its oil. High production and lower than expected demand mean that oil prices will continue to fall well into 2016.
In the short term China's slowing growth and the glut of oil are driving down the price. The situation will be exacerbated by the lifting of sanctions allowing Iran to sell its oil. High production and lower than expected demand mean that oil prices will continue to fall well into 2016.
Monday, November 23, 2015
Financial Losses Associated with Fossil Fuels
The losses associated with fossil fuels are staggering and it is not just oil producing states and companies that are feeling the heat. Pension funds going long on oil are getting killed as they hope that prices will rebound.
With oil prices around $50 per barrel, the IEA estimates that OPEC states have lost half a trillion dollars a year in revenues since the oil price fell from over $100 a barrel in 2011-2014 to current levels. The declining price of oil is also creating volatility in the stock market and significantly impacting the petro-economies of both Russia and Canada.
With oil prices around $50 per barrel, the IEA estimates that OPEC states have lost half a trillion dollars a year in revenues since the oil price fell from over $100 a barrel in 2011-2014 to current levels. The declining price of oil is also creating volatility in the stock market and significantly impacting the petro-economies of both Russia and Canada.
Wednesday, March 25, 2015
Low Oil Prices Offer an Opportunity to Combat Climate Change
The plunge in the price of oil makes this an ideal time to deploy market disincentives that can cut emissions and combat climate change. We know that if we are to stave off the worst impacts of climate change we must substantially reduce our emissions. As the leading cause of climate change fossil fuels are the most obvious focal point.
All but the willfully ignorant understand that the economic costs of inaction far outweigh the costs of engagement. We have seen a number of studies which suggest the longer we wait the more it will cost.
All but the willfully ignorant understand that the economic costs of inaction far outweigh the costs of engagement. We have seen a number of studies which suggest the longer we wait the more it will cost.
Monday, August 26, 2013
ALEC Must Die
There is a sinister force that is corrupting American politics by
giving the most environmentally destructive elements of Big Business
significant control over state legislatures. The American Legislative Exchange Council
(ALEC) turns 40 this year. This organization is composed of large
corporations and state lawmakers. They draft environmentally harmful
model laws that have been adopted in state legislatures across the
country.
ALEC describes itself as “nonpartisan public-private partnership” and is registered as a not for profit organization. While the organization enjoys 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status, many groups see it as little more than a front for one of the most powerful and influential lobby groups in America.
ALEC describes itself as “nonpartisan public-private partnership” and is registered as a not for profit organization. While the organization enjoys 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status, many groups see it as little more than a front for one of the most powerful and influential lobby groups in America.
Saturday, August 17, 2013
Video - United States of ALEC
Moyers & Company presents "United States of ALEC," a report on the most influential corporate-funded political force most of America has never heard of -- ALEC, the American Legislative Exchange Council. A national consortium of state politicians and powerful corporations, ALEC presents itself as a "nonpartisan public-private partnership." But behind that mantra lies a vast network of corporate lobbying and political action aimed to increase corporate profits at public expense without public knowledge.
Video - United States of ALEC: A Follow-Up
Moyers & Company follows up on a breakthrough 2012 report about ALEC, the American Legislative Exchange Council. A national consortium of state politicians and powerful corporations, ALEC presents itself as a "nonpartisan public-private partnership." But behind that mantra lies a network of lobbying and political action aimed to increase corporate profits at public expense without public knowledge.
Video - ALEC's Organized Corruption
ALEC creates model bills, drafted by lobbyists and lawmakers. This includes support for the lax regulations in the fossil fuel industry and resistance to clean sources of energy.
However there ALEC's influence extends far beyond crafting model legislation. As explained in the New York Times, "a review of internal ALEC documents shows that this is only one facet of a sophisticated operation for shaping public policy at a state-by-state level. The records offer a glimpse of how special interests effectively turn ALEC's lawmaker members into stealth lobbyists, providing them with talking points, signaling how they should vote and collaborating on bills affecting hundreds of issues like school vouchers and tobacco taxes. The documents — hundreds of pages of minutes of private meetings, member e-mail alerts and correspondence — were obtained by the watchdog group Common Cause and shared with The New York Times..."
Related Articles
ALEC Must Die
Video - How ALEC Controls US Legislation
Video - ALEC Bill on Capitol Hill
Video - United States of ALEC
Video - United States of ALEC: A Follow-Up
Saturday, August 10, 2013
Video - How ALEC Controls US Legislation
This is an important report on the subversion of America's legislative process by Big Oil and other corporate interests. The "United States of ALEC," is a report from Moyers & Company on the most influential corporate-funded political force most of America has never heard of -- ALEC, the American Legislative Exchange Council.
Thursday, March 28, 2013
Republicans Oppose the PTC but Support Oil Subsidies
It is not surprising that many Republicans who oppose the Production Tax Credit (PTC) for renewable energy, support fossil fuel subsidies. Although the PTC was extended through 2013, some Republicans have vowed to continue their push to kill it. Conservatives are well known for their love of free markets and distrust of government subsidies, unless of course it involves fossil fuels. Some Republicans in Congress have made it clear that they will seek amendments that erode the PTC.
Republicans including the 2012 presidential nominee Mitt Romney, wanted to let the PTC expire. Romney and other Republicans who oppose the PTC say it costs too much and props up businesses with government subsidies.
Romney spokesman Ryan Williams said in an email that Romney "believes the government should stop playing venture capitalist and doling out open-ended subsidies, and instead encourage private sector innovation and market competition.” This is part of the same conservative philosophy that advocates for unbridled free markets and supports deregulation.
Republicans including the 2012 presidential nominee Mitt Romney, wanted to let the PTC expire. Romney and other Republicans who oppose the PTC say it costs too much and props up businesses with government subsidies.
Romney spokesman Ryan Williams said in an email that Romney "believes the government should stop playing venture capitalist and doling out open-ended subsidies, and instead encourage private sector innovation and market competition.” This is part of the same conservative philosophy that advocates for unbridled free markets and supports deregulation.
Monday, September 10, 2012
BP Accused of Corporate Recklessness Including Willful Misconduct, Gross Neglect and Making False Statements
A recent US Justice Department court filing, accuses British Petroleum (BP) of gross neglect, as well as making false and misleading comments. The accusations stem from BP's handling of the 2010 explosion of the Deepwater Horizon that spilled 5 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico and killed 11 workers.
The Justice Department alleges false statements and misrepresentation over BP's assertion that the Gulf Coast's natural resources are making a "robust recovery" from its massive 2010 oil spill.
The Justice Department alleges false statements and misrepresentation over BP's assertion that the Gulf Coast's natural resources are making a "robust recovery" from its massive 2010 oil spill.
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Tell the G20 to End Fossil Fuel Subsidies Now
Our tax dollars are being used to subsidize massive oil companies that are making astronomical profits. Big Oil is not only responsible for climate change they are using their record-breaking profits on massive misinformation campaigns and political influence. A growing number of people are seeking to put an end to this $600 billion dollar a year travesty. One of those groups is Avaaz.org, they are organizing a protest against Big Oil when the G20 convenes in Washington and a petition to put an end to fossil fuel subsidies. The following is an excerpt of an Avaaz.org article and call to action called Paid to Pollute:
Friday, March 30, 2012
GOP Fights Removal of Oil Subsidies
Republicans have rejected a bill that would have killed tax breaks for big oil companies. Despite the President's plea to end oil subsidies, on Thursday March 29 the Senate voted 51-47 against a Democratic bill that would remove billions of dollars in oil company tax breaks. President Obama has been a champion of ending big oil's subsidies since taking office. "It's like hitting the American people twice," Obama said. "You're already paying a premium at the pump right now. And on top of that, Congress...has thought it was a good idea to send billions of dollars more in tax dollars to the oil industry."
Sunday, July 17, 2011
Federal Provincial Energy Conference Sponsored by Big Oil
Eleven companies and associations are spending an unprecedented $180,000 to pay for nearly a third of the $600,000 price tag. The sponsorship is an attempt by the petroleum industry to influence people who will be making crucial decisions about Canada's energy future. The sponsors have access to key individuals and they are given a high profile on the website for the conference.
Monday, July 4, 2011
Obama's Call for an End to Oil Subsidies and Big Oil's Suggestion
To make cuts in American government spending the President has once again proposed ending oil subsidies. On Wednesday June 29, President Barack Obama, indicated that it reasonable to expect oil and gas companies that “have done so well” in the current economy to give up some breaks to help close federal deficits. “I don’t think that’s real radical,” he said.In response to calls to end oil subsidies, Jack Gerard, president of the American Petroleum Institute, told Washington Wire, rather than cutting subsidies or raising taxes on the oil and gas industry, America should increase their exploitation of domestic petroleum resources.
The industry has been pushing for more production in places such as the Gulf of Mexico and Alaska. Big Oil is seemingly oblivious to the environmental costs. These risks are particularly great as they apply to offshore oil.
Last summer we witnessed a massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico and Alaska has seen its share of devastating oil spills. The 1989, Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska impacted over 1100 miles of non-continuous coastline in Alaska. Despite miles of booms, scores of skimming ships and armies of beach washers, only 14 percent of the oil was ever cleaned up.
In the 2010 Gulf of Mexico spill, more than 700 million liters of crude oil leaked into the water. Some have suggested that efforts to address the spill have exacerbated the problem. Dispersants used to reduce the size of the oil slick also impacting upon marine ecosystems. A break in a BP-owned pipeline on the North Coast of Alaska spewed 200,000 gallons of oil in March 2006.
The fact that fossil fuels are the leading cause of climate change make taking advice from Big Oil sort of like asking a thief about security. Its would be a great idea if they did not want to steal from you.
© 2011, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.
Related Post
Independence Day 2011: Declaration of Freedom from Fossil Fuels
Saturday, November 6, 2010
Republican Gubernatorial Gains and the Clean Energy Economy
The big loser in the 2010 Gubernatorial elections is America’s clean energy economy. Overall, the Republicans picked up 11 governorships from the Democrats: Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Michigan, New Mexico, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Wisconsin and Wyoming. The GOP also gained back the Florida governorship. By comparison, the Dems only picked up California, Hawaii and Vermont.The race is still officially undecided in Connecticut, although reports indicate that the Republican candidate is ahead, and in Minnesota the winner has yet to be announced, but the Republican candidate is said to be leading.
The governors of Illinois, New Mexico, Kansas, Florida, Oklahoma, and Wyoming are global warming deniers and conspiracy theorists who are getting ready to lead a crusade against a rational approach to climate change.
In Iowa, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Wyoming, four Democratic governors who have supported clean energy were replaced by Republicans who are beholden to the old energy economy.
Republican governors are now virtually unanimous in their dismissal of global warming. They do not recognize the threat posed by climate change, nor do they support clean energy.
By denying the fact of global warming, Republican governors preclude the need to respond. However, what seems like a clever political strategy may in fact prove to be disastrous. By eschewing clean energy opportunities these governors risk turning their states into economic wastelands.
Related Posts
The Foxes in the Henhouse: Republicans in Charge of Climate and Energy Committees
Republican Gubernatorial Gains and US Carbon Trading Programs
Republican Gubernatorial Gains and Redistricting
Republicans' Anti-Science Stance on Global Warming
Republican Strategy for the 2010 Midterms and Beyond
Republican Political Finance and the Midterm Elections
Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
Environmental Issues in California and 5 Key Senate Races
The 2010 Midterms and the Fight Against Climate Change
Deniers Deprived of Misinformation Strategy
The Dangerous Diversion of Climategate
The Business of Climate Change Deception
The New International System: The Role of Government
What is Wrong with the Right
Friday, October 22, 2010
Republican Political Finance and the 2010 Midterm Elections
Campaign finance is a big issue this election cycle in part because a Supreme Court ruling that removed contribution limits. This year, is the first national election since the Court's decision opened the floodgates enabling companies (primarily the fossil fuel industry) to spend unlimited sums to support candidates who will protect the interests of the old energy economy.
To help facilitate the influx of money, Republicans and their allies have set up new organizations, nicknamed super PACs, these groups accept and spend unlimited contributions without disclosing their donors.
The Sunlight foundation, a nonpartisan group that advocates for government transparency, estimates that nearly $100 million in what it calls "dark money" is finding its way into midterm election races. That's about half of all the money from outside groups, and most of it is going to Republicans.
The Sunlight foundation says Republican-supporting super PACs and other independent groups are outspending those allied with Democrats by nearly $41 million. The Campaign Finance Institute at George Washington University puts the disparity at $63.5 million. They also cite a 73 percent rise in spending since 2008 by independent outside groups.
Environmental groups also donate money and influence the debate, however, the massive resources of the oil industry dwarf environmental groups. In 2009, the oil industry spent over $175 million lobbying against climate change legislation whereas all environmental groups together spent about 7 percent of that amount or $24 million.
Another important distinguishing factor of environmental groups lobbying efforts is that they are working to create green jobs, reduce pollution and combat climate change. Republican candidates are taking money from the petrochemical industry who are seeking to protect oil interests at the expense of green jobs and a clean energy economy.
The Democrat's efforts to pass a disclosure bill this year, ran into a wall of GOP opposition. With all the money flowing to Republican candidates from big oil, it is no wonder they resist transparency. It also helps to explain poll results favoring Republican candidates.
Americans deserve to know the truth about money that is coming from out of state, particularly money coming from those with a dirty agenda.
Related Posts
Koch Spending on Political Influence
The Kochs War on Industry Oversight and Environmental Regulation
Koch's Tea Party Republicans and Climate Change Denial
Koch Industries and the Tea Party's Corporate "Grassroots"
Republican Strategy for the 2010 Midterms and Beyond
Republican's Anti-Science Stance on Global Warming
Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
The Tea Party and Republican Obstructionism
Tea Party Candidates and O'Donnell's Constitution Confusion
Tea Party's Climate Change Denial
California's Proposition 23
What is Wrong with the Right
Climate Change is a Security Issue
Environmental Issues in California and 5 Key Senate Races
The 2010 Midterms and the Fight Against Climate Change
Election 2010 Midterm Predictions
Democrat's Chances in the 2010 Midterms
The Global Work Party and US Midterm Elections
Health Care Legislation and Implications for the Environment
Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
Van Jones Succumbs to Republican Pressure
Why We Did Not Get A Binding Agreement At COP15
Obama Needs the Senate to Succeed on Climate Change
Deniers Deprived of Misinformation Strategy
The Dangerous Diversion of Climategate
How to get Through to Climate Change Deniers
Sarah Palin: Tea Party Queen but No Friend of Green
Palin Renews Call for Offshore Oil Exploitation
Sarah Palin Belongs on Fox Not Discovery
Palin is No Friend of Green
Palin Blames Environmentalists for Oil Spill
Limbaugh Blames the Sierra Club for Oil Spill
The New International System: The Role of Government
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
Environmental Activism and Social Media
The Global Work Party organized by 350.org is at the forefront of a successful new approach to social change. The 10/10/10 event is a prime example of the new social movement powered by the extraordinary reach of the Web. The proliferation of increasingly powerful mobile technologies have radically increased the reach and immediacy of social advocacy.
The unprecedented success of 350.org's "International Day of Climate Action" on October 24th 2009, was eclipsed only by this year's 10/10/10 Global Work Party event. Thanks to digital media like chat, text messaging, and social networks, the 350.org team mobilized over 7000 actions in 188 countries this year.
Some have called this reliance on accessible online tools "open source" activism. The use of new media is building an enduring climate constituency.
Activists are downloading online toolkits for decentralized events and using the power of social media to push for greater climate protection. Coordinated online outreach has made the immense scale of the Global Work Party possible.
Thanks to social media, climate activists are cultivating resources that are mobilizing people in ways that are transforming our cultures and our civilizations.
Climate activists are up against the immense resources of the fossil fuel industry and their powerful propaganda machines. While environmental groups cannot outspend or outmaneuver the fossil fuel industry, social media is leveling the playing field and democratizing the debate.
Related Posts
10/10/10 Proves the Environmental Movement is Bigger than Ever
The Business of Earth Hour and the Power of Social Media
Social Media and the Green Message: WWF Global Online Event
Blog Action Day 2009: One of the Largest Climate Change
Social Media and Sustainability
Environmental Revolution: Honest Marketing
Earth Day Digital Tool Kit
The Power of Social Media and the Importance of Market Segmentation
Social Media and ROI
The Growth of Mobile
Mobile Marketing: A Green Opportunity
11 Sites that Specialize in Green Video Content
Online Video Consumption
Video Sharing Strategy in 12 Simple Steps
Green Video Sharing
Best Green Videos
The Green Market Makes EvanCarmichael's List of Top 50 Social Entrepreneurship Blogs
350.org's 10/10/10 Event
10/10/10 Global Work Party Message for Governments
Fossil Fuel Calamities and Deadly Weather Underscore the Urgency of the 10/10/10 Event
Bill McKibben Goes to the White House
White House Agrees to Put Solar On It
McKibben Calls Extreme Weather Events Climate Disasters
The Global Work Party and US Midterm Elections
Canada and 350.org's 10/10/10 Event
Letter of Thanks from Bill McKibben
Message of Thanks from the President of the Maldives
350.org Makes History with Day of Climate Change Action
350.org: International Day of Climate Change Action Events
350.org: International Day of Climate Action
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
The Global Work Party and US Midterm Elections
According to the 2010 Environmental Performance Index (EPI) the US has a score of 63.5 which puts it well behind Western European nations. Although this Congress did not succeed in passing environmental legislation, we are much less likely to see climate or energy legislation if the Republicans get the majority they seek in November 2010.
Judging by the polls, American voters do not seem to understand that the environment is a priority issue and not only for the planet but for the economy and for jobs as well.
Perhaps this historic day of action will help galvanize Democrats to get out and vote to stave off a Republican majority that will kill any hope legislative progress.
Related Posts
The 2010 Midterms and the Fight Against Climate Change
Republican Strategy for the 2010 Midterms and Beyond
Republican's Anti-Science Stance on Global Warming
Tea Party Candidates and O'Donnell's Constitution Confusion
Democrat's Chances in the 2010 Midterms
Clean Tech Job Trends 2010 Report: Global Competition
Clean Tech Job Trends 2010 Report: Manufacturing Issues and Recommendations
A Green Jobs Bill Will Have to Wait
Oakland's Green Jobs and Energy Initiatives
California's Government Partnerships are Driving the Green Economy
Growing US Corporate Investments are Driving Cleantech in 2010
The Green Job Market
Green Stimulus: Global Green New Deal
Sustainable Education is Key to Accessing the Green Economy
Green Schools are Bridging the Knowledge Gap
Leading the Green Job Market with a Sustainable MBA
350.org's 10/10/10 Event
10/10/10 Global Work Party Message for Governments
10/10/10 Proves the Environmental Movement is Biggest Ever
Fossil Fuel Calamities and Deadly Weather Underscore the Urgency of the 10/10/10 Event
Bill McKibben Goes to the White House
White House Agrees to Put Solar On It
McKibben Calls Extreme Weather Events Climate Disasters
Environmental Activism and Social Media
Canada and 350.org's 10/10/10 Event
Letter of Thanks from Bill McKibben
Message of Thanks from the President of the Maldives
350.org Makes History with Day of Climate Change Action
350.org: International Day of Climate Change Action Events
350.org: International Day of Climate Action
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



