Republicans Dethrone Czars and Defund the President's Policies

House Republicans are using their powers to declare war on Democrats, public health and the environment. Despite warnings that tightening the belt too much too soon could harm the economy, the Republican-controlled House voted to drastically cut spending and defund the President's policies.

After five days of debate, the spending bill passed a divided House at 4:40 a.m. on Saturday February 19, 2011. Without any support from Democrats, the House approved several Republican amendments to deny funds to federal agencies including the EPA.

Health care was also under assault. Democratic Rep. Sander Levin said, "Instead of searching for common ground, this amendment intensifies warfare," Levin continued, "The Republicans have become a wrecking crew."

Republicans have also targeted Obama's czars as undemocratic even though many previous presidents have used them. On February 17, 2011, House Republicans voted to strip congressional funding for nine executive branch czars. This was the first raid in a much larger Republican war against the President's policies. The amendment to the continuing resolution funding government operations identifies nine czars and orders that no money goes to pay for them or their staffs.

One of amendment's top targets is US Special Envoy for Climate Change Todd Stern, Obama's chief treaty negotiator at the UN global warming talks, it also defunds Obama's climate adviser. Other czars whose funding would be eliminated under the amendments include the green jobs czar, and the auto manufacturing czar. The amendment also proposes eliminating two czar slots that are unfilled including the energy and climate-change czar. Democrats called it a political attack masquerading as a principled spending cut.

Either by refusing to increase the cap on federal spending or through gridlock, the Republicans appear determined to shutdown government. Even if things do get moving again, the Republican war on the environment is far from over. Rep. Ralph Hall (R-Tex.), chairman of the Science Committee, indicated that he plans to use tax payers dollars to hold hearings that examine, yet again, the basis of climate science.


Related Posts
State Green Jobs Initiatives Need Federal Legislation
Republican Opposition to Obama's Clean Energy Standard
Video: EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson's Address at the Good Jobs Green Jobs Conference
Republican Cuts Target Green
Foxes in the Henhouse: Republican Control of the Climate and Energy Committees
Republican Gubernatorial Gains and Redistricting
Republican Gubernatorial Gains and the Clean Energy Economy
Republican Gubernatorial Gains and US Carbon Trading Programs
Republicans' Anti-Science Stance on Global Warming
Republican Strategy for the 2010 Midterms and Beyond
Republican Political Finance and the Midterm Elections
Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
Government Investment Green Jobs and Economic Recovery
Government Incentives are Growing Renewable Energy
Green Stimulus Investments and Job Creation
Green Jobs for America
Highlights of Obama's 2011 State of the Union Address: Clean Energy,
Video: Green Jobs
Democrats the Environment and Green Jobs
A Green Jobs Bill Will Have to Wait
The Green Job Market
House Democrats Punished Despite Populist Pandering
House Lawmakers Oppose New Car Ratings
Democrats Learning the Wrong Lesson from Republicans
Senate Democrats and the Environmental Agenda
Democrats the Environment and Green Jobs
Video: How to Get People to Vote for Climate Change
Environmental Issues in California and 5 Key Senate Races
The 2010 Midterms and the Fight Against Climate Change
The New International System: The Role of Government
What is Wrong with the Right

Climate Change is an Economic and a Security Issue

Economic and security concerns impel us to act on climate change. Science and common sense demand that we develop an effective strategy for dealing with climate change.

Climate change is inseparably connected to energy security, food security and water security. Failure to tackle it undermines relations between nations, intensifies competition for resources and leads to conflict and war.

Without an effective response to climate change, our security is under threat and our economies will suffer. If left unchecked climate change will cost trillions of dollars and threaten life as we know it.

Everyone, everywhere, will be affected and the poorest will suffer most. The overarching impact of climate change makes it one of the most pressing security issues of our times.

An effective response demands a global agreement to reduce greenhouse gases. It is therefor imperative that both developed and developing nations take action together.

A series of UN sponsored conferences are striving to meet the challenges of climate change security. Two of the most important UN efforts this year are the 16th Conference of the Parties (COP 16) and the 6th Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (CMP 6). They are both taking place between November 29 and December 10, 2010.


Related Posts
How to get Through to Climate Change Deniers
The Tea Party and Republican Obstructionism
Tea Party Candidates and O'Donnell's Constitution Confusion
Tea Party's Climate Change Denial
The Effects of Global Warming
Climate Change is a Real Threat
Alarming Facts About Water
Investing in Water
A Sustainable World Order
WWF's One Planet Leaders Program
US Pledges to Reduce GHGs by 17%