Showing posts with label self interest. Show all posts
Showing posts with label self interest. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Senate Democrats and the Environmental Agenda

Despite midterm election losses in the Senate, the Democrats managed to hang on to a narrow majority. But what does that mean for energy and climate issues?

Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) has won re-election and will remain Chairwoman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. Boxer will continue to work for clean energy and the environment.

Senator Harry Reid (D-Nev) will retain his position as Majority Leader. Senator Reid has been the President’s lead advocate on advancing renewable energy and regulating the fossil fuel industry.

Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) will remain the Chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. Senator Bingaman is a lead proponent of a renewable electricity mandate. Bingaman is also an advocate of more responsible rules for offshore oil and gas production.

Besides control of these committees, the Democratic Senate majority could stop the Republican controlled House from getting environmentally destructive legislation onto the President's desk. But we should remember that Democratic Senators have little respect for party discipline and some have demonstrated a propensity to break ranks when they feel it serves their political interests.

Democratic Senators who have betrayed the party, the President and the environment, include Sens. Ben Nelson, (D-Neb.), Jim Webb, (D-Va.). Mary Landrieu (D-La.) and Kent Conrad (D-N.D.).

With the Democrats holding 23 of the 33 Senate seats being contested in 2012 (including two independents who caucus with the Democrats), Senators will have to choose between pandering to public confusion or taking on the tough issues. It remains to be seen whether Democrats will try to lead America to a cleaner more secure future or follow the polls and cower in fear.


Related Posts
Democrats Learning the Wrong Lesson from Republicans
House Democrats Punished Despite Populist Pandering
Democrats the Environment and Green Jobs
Video: How to Get People to Vote for Climate Change
Foxes in the Henhouse: Republicans Climate and Energy Committees
Republican Gubernatorial Gains and Redistricting
Republican Gubernatorial Gains and the Clean Energy Economy
Republican Gubernatorial Gains and US Carbon Trading Programs
Republicans' Anti-Science Stance on Global Warming
Republican Strategy for the 2010 Midterms and Beyond
Republican Political Finance and the Midterm Elections
Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
Environmental Issues in California and 5 Key Senate Races
The 2010 Midterms and the Fight Against Climate Change
Deniers Deprived of Misinformation Strategy
The Dangerous Diversion of Climategate
The Business of Climate Change Deception
The New International System: The Role of Government
What is Wrong with the Right

Democrats Learning the Wrong Lesson from Republicans

Although Republicans are the undisputed masters of the smear campaign, some Democrats are no better. In the 2010 midterm elections, Democrats followed the polls and fell silent on the issue of climate change. In the process, Democrats abandoned their President and their parties agenda.

To gain political favor Democrats used tactics more commonly associated with Republicans. Democratic candidates for the House resorted to attack ads devoid of an issue oriented message. They dug up Republican candidates’ personal financial records and Democratic candidate Ron Klein put his Republican opponent’s Social Security number in a TV ad.

Democratic candidate Frank Caprio told Obama to “Shove it!” on a radio show, referring to the President's endorsement. Caprio subsequently failed in his bid for governor of Rhode Island, but this tactic is reminiscent of South Carolina Republican Joe Wilson shouting, "You lie!" during President Obama's speech to Congress.

Democrats should not look to the Republicans for anything, the right is the wrong direction for America. Rather than engaging the misinformation that passes as fact, Democrats are looking for a strategy to win re-election thereby putting self interest ahead of the national interest.

Democrats need to do a much better job addressing the issues and communicating a party platform that explains the need for action on energy and climate change. Above all Democrats need to stop following Republicans and show America they know the meaning of leadership.


Related Posts
Senate Democrats and the Environmental Agenda
House Democrats Punished Despite Populist Pandering
Democrats the Environment and Green Jobs
Video: How to Get People to Vote for Climate Change
Foxes in the Henhouse: Republicans Climate and Energy Committees
Republican Gubernatorial Gains and Redistricting
Republican Gubernatorial Gains and the Clean Energy Economy
Republican Gubernatorial Gains and US Carbon Trading Programs
Republicans' Anti-Science Stance on Global Warming
Republican Strategy for the 2010 Midterms and Beyond
Republican Political Finance and the Midterm Elections
Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
Environmental Issues in California and 5 Key Senate Races
The 2010 Midterms and the Fight Against Climate Change
Deniers Deprived of Misinformation Strategy
The Dangerous Diversion of Climategate
The Business of Climate Change Deception
The New International System: The Role of Government
What is Wrong with the Right

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

House Democrats Punished Despite Populist Pandering

Many Democrats are guilty of pandering to populism. Rather than sticking to the facts and communicating the truth, Democratic candidates are avoiding contentious issues to save their political skins.

Although it is clear that Republicans are global warming deniers, the Democrats must also shoulder blame for the failure of Congress to secure climate and energy legislation in President Obama's first term.

Taking their cues from polls, Democrats ignored the environment during the 2010 midterms. They failed to communicate the urgency of climate change and the importance of being a competitive player in the burgeoning green economy. This kind of political cowardice undermines efforts to engage the struggle against climate change and puts American global comptitiveness at risk.

In 2009, the House of Representatives passed the American Clean Energy and Security Act, also known as the Waxman-Markey energy and climate bill. With increasingly numbers of Americans succumbing to misinformation, Democrats who resisted the bill could be mistaken for a shrewd strategists intent on self preservation.

However, many House Democrats who voted against the bill, lost their bids for re-election. Two dozen House Democrats who voted for the energy and climate bill were voted out of office in the 2010 midterms, along with 19 who opposed the bill.

With the electorate so woefully confused on climate change, America needs leaders that will aggresively engage misfinformation. By following public opinion on climate change rather than leading the discussion, Democrats are reifying the Republican's lies.


Related Posts
Democrats Learning the Wrong Lesson from Republicans
Senate Democrats and the Environmental Agenda
Democrats the Environment and Green Jobs
Video: How to Get People to Vote for Climate Change
Foxes in the Henhouse: Republicans Climate and Energy Committees
Republican Gubernatorial Gains and Redistricting
Republican Gubernatorial Gains and the Clean Energy Economy
Republican Gubernatorial Gains and US Carbon Trading Programs
Republicans' Anti-Science Stance on Global Warming
Republican Strategy for the 2010 Midterms and Beyond
Republican Political Finance and the Midterm Elections
Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
Environmental Issues in California and 5 Key Senate Races
The 2010 Midterms and the Fight Against Climate Change
Deniers Deprived of Misinformation Strategy
The Dangerous Diversion of Climategate
The Business of Climate Change Deception
The New International System: The Role of Government
What is Wrong with the Right

Saturday, August 9, 2008

Creative Capitalism: Market-Based Social Change

To be sustainable a business must also be profitable. Readers of The Green Market know that I am an earnest advocate of viable socially responsible business. This philosophy is put into practice in my firm's Green consulting projects with the small business community. Implicit in this philosophy is the marriage of market forces and social responsibility.

This is not a new idea. Almost half a century ago David Rockefeller, the president of Chase Manhattan Bank, said, "The old concept that the owner of a business had a right to use his property as a he pleased to maximize profits has evolved into the belief that ownership carries certain binding social obligations." In recent years Microsoft's Bill Gates has joined the ranks of a growing number of people who share this view. For the past 20 years, Microsoft has used corporate philanthropy as a way to bring technology to people who don't have access. They have donated more than $3 billion in cash and software and perhaps most importantly shown people how to use technology to create solutions. In a January 24, 2008 speech at the World Economic Forum, Gates outlined sensible solutions to the challenges we face.

Gates used to believe that technology could solve all the key problems and although this is true for billions of people, "breakthroughs change lives only where people can afford to buy them—only where there is economic demand. And economic demand is not the same as economic need." Technological innovations are important but insufficient to address the myriad challenges we face. To truly improve the fate of the planet and its inhabitants we require what Gates has called 'system innovation'.

We have reason for optimism, we have seen significant improvements on many fronts from the status of women and minorities, to radicaly increased life expectancy. And political, social and economic freedoms have never been enjoyed by more people around the world. However, like Gates, I am an impatient optimist who seeks expedient solutions to the problems we face.

A major problem with capitalism is that market incentives often cause people and the environment to benefit in inverse proportion to their need. Capitalism that serves large corporations and wealthier people must be made to serve poorer people and the environment as well. We need to refine the capitalist system so that it benefits the environment and all its inhabitants. "The great advances in the world have often aggravated the inequities in the world. The least needy see the most improvement, and the most needy see the least. Not only do these people miss the benefits of the global economy – they will suffer from the negative effects of economic growth they missed out on. Climate change will have the biggest effect on people who have done the least to cause it."

Capitalism may be flawed in some important respects but they are fixable problems which do not detract from its many positive attributes. "The genius of capitalism lies in its ability to make self-interest serve the wider interest. The potential of a big financial return for innovation unleashes a broad set of talented people in pursuit of many different discoveries. This system driven by self-interest is responsible for the great innovations that have improved the lives of billions."

Capitalism harnesses self-interest in helpful and sustainable ways, but only on behalf of those who can pay. And environmental, philanthropic and governmental organizations are inadequate to meet the needs of the earth and its poor. We need a system that is capable of providing rapid improvements, a system that integrates creative innovation and market driven business.

A social mission is compatible with profits. In Gate's own words "To make the system sustainable, we need to use profit incentives whenever we can." When profits are not possible, recognition is a powerful market-based incentive for socially responsible businesses. "Recognition enhances a company's reputation and appeals to customers; above all, it attracts good people to the organization. As such, recognition triggers a market-based reward for good behavior. In markets where profits are not possible, recognition is a proxy; where profits are possible, recognition is an added incentive. The challenge is to design a system where market incentives, including profits and recognition, drive the change." Consumers then reward companies who do good work by buying their products. To help us to recognize those who have made contributions to social causes like Green, we need to invest intellectual capital to find ways for businesses, governments, NGOs, and the media to develop tools to measure social responsibility. "[R]ecognition brings market-based rewards to businesses that do the most work."

According to Gates, "there are two great forces of human nature: self-interest, and caring for others. The system innovation proposed by Gates is nothing less than a paradigm shift. He calls this innovation creative capitalism. "This is an approach where governments, businesses, and nonprofits work together to stretch the reach of market forces so that more people can make a profit, or gain recognition, doing work that eases the world's inequities." Helping others and the environment is not as far removed from the core of capitalism as some might think. The father of capitalism Adam Smith opened his first book with the following lines: "How selfish soever man may be supposed, there are evidently some principles in his nature, which interest him in the fortunes of others, and render their happiness necessary to him, though he derives nothing from it, except the pleasure of seeing it."

"Creative capitalism takes this interest in the fortunes of others and ties it to our interest in our own fortunes—in ways that help advance both. This hybrid engine of self-interest and concern for others serves a much wider circle of people than can be reached by self-interest or caring alone." We must give our most innovative thinkers the time and resources to come up with solutions to the challenges of environmental degradation, poverty and disease. "This kind of creative capitalism matches business expertise with needs in the developing world to find markets that are already there, but are untapped. Sometimes market forces fail to make an impact in developing countries not because there's no demand, or because money is lacking, but because we don’t spend enough time studying the needs and limits of that market."

There are numerous examples of creative capitalism in the world today. One of the most accessible approaches employs tiered pricing. When the World Health Organization wanted to expand vaccination for meningitis in Africa, it first ascertained what people could afford to pay. Then they challenged their partners to meet this price. Another is Bono's RED Campaign which has demonstrated that people will pay a premium for the chance to be associated with a cause they care about. One of my personal favorites is Muhammad Yunus' now worldwide movement in microfinance. And cap and trade systems of greenhouse gas management are yet another well known example of creative capitalism. The potential ways in which creative capitalism can serve socially responsible causes are limitless.

Creative capitalism includes a direct role for governments in funding research and setting policy (legislation). Governments should disburse funds in ways that create market incentives for sustainable business activity. "What unifies all forms of creative capitalism is that they are market-driven efforts to bring solutions...As we refine and improve this approach, there is every reason to believe these engines of change will become larger, stronger, and more efficient. There is a growing understanding around the world that when change is driven by market-based incentives, you have a sustainable plan for change—because profits and recognition are renewable resources. These are not a few isolated stories; this is a world-wide movement, and we all have the ability and the responsibility to accelerate it."

There is a place for business, government and the non-profit world. Creative capitalism stretches the reach of market forces to help push things forward. From foreign aid to charitable gifts, we must find ways to put the power of market forces behind the effort to reduce our environmental impact.

We are living at a pivotal moment in human history, the paradigm shift proposed will enable us to find approaches that address the environmental and social problems we face. We need to understand that sustainable solutions entail projects that generate profits and where profit is not possible, recognition that enables consumers to reward these companies by buying their products. We can change the world and creative capitalism is key to the growth of socially responsible movements like Green, because there is no Green future without profitable Green companies.