Showing posts with label midterm. Show all posts
Showing posts with label midterm. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Democrats the Environment and Green Jobs

Over the last couple of years the Democrats have passed legislation that staved off economic calamity. Contrary to the Republican attacks ads, the President's stimulus package has helped to create jobs and is poised to do more in the next couple of years.

A January 2010 report by the President’s Council of Economic Advisers found the clean energy provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act had already saved or created 63000 jobs and they are expected to create more than 700,000 green jobs by 2012.

Green careers could play an important role in the ongoing recovery of the US economy and they are crucial to future job growth. Green holds more potential for real economic growth than any other industry.

Clean energy is a national security issue and an issue of global competitiveness. President Obama wants to advance green industry so that the US can be a competitive leader.

Many Democrats understand that we do not need to choose between a healthy economy and a healthy environment. The President and many Democrats seek to create green jobs by promoting clean technologies, for this generation and future generations.

A recent Pew Research Centre poll showed just 16% of Republicans say the earth is warming because of human activity, compared to 53% for Democrats.


Related Posts
Environmental Assessment of President Obama's First 100 Days
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
Sustainable Recovery
The Way Forward
Democrat's Chances in the 2010 Midterms
EPA's Proposed Rule to Regulate Emissions
Environmental Issues in California and 5 Key Senate Races
Election 2010 Midterm Predictions
The 2010 Midterms and the Fight Against Climate Change
The Global Work Party and US Midterm Elections
California's Proposition 23
Health Care Legislation and Implications for the Environment
Why We Did Not Get A Binding Agreement At COP15
Obama Needs the Senate to Succeed on Climate Change
Deniers Deprived of Misinformation Strategy
The Dangerous Diversion of Climategate
The Business of Climate Change Deception
The New International System: The Role of Government
What is Wrong with the Right
Tea Party Bolsters Republican Commitment to Obstructionism
Tea Party's Climate Change Denial
Tea Party Candidates and O'Donnell's Constitution Confusion
Republicans' Anti-Science Stance on Global Warming
Republican Strategy for the 2010 Midterms and Beyond
Republican Political Finance and the Midterm Elections
Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition

Monday, October 18, 2010

Republicans' Anti-Science Stance on Global Warming

Republican contenders are towing the climate denial line ahead of the midterm elections. An influx of Republicans means that both chambers will be polluted by more anti-science skeptics of human-induced global warming.

The facts are hard to refute, but where there is a will there is a way. Although some Republicans will concede that the climate is warming, they do not attribute it to human activity.

Gov. John Boozman, Arkansas explained it this way, “I think that we’ve got perhaps climate change going on. The question is what’s causing it. Is man causing it, or, you know, is this a cycle that happens throughout the years, throughout the ages. And you can look back some of the previous times when there was no industrialization, you had these different ages, ice ages, and things warming and things. That’s the question.”

Despite Republican efforts to deny, the fact remains that the vast majority of scientists and scientific literature recognizes that humans are causing global warming. While 97% of climate experts agree that humans are causing global warming, incredibly, GOP Senate candidates unanimously disagree with the scientists.

Of all the Republicans vying for the 37 Senate seats in the 2010 election, only one, Rep. Mike Castle of Delaware, supported strong climate action. Now that Castle has been resoundingly defeated by Tea Party candidate Christine (not a witch) O’Donnell, the GOP slate is unanimous in its opposition to a green economy.

Despite the overwhelming body of evidence, Sharron Angle, the Tea Party candidate running against Sen. Harry Reid in Nevada, described climate change legislation as being “based on an unscientific hysteria over the man-caused global warming hoax.”

It is not only the candidates spawned by the Tea Party that are making absurd statements. Rep. Roy Blunt of Missouri said, “there isn’t any real science to say we are altering the climate path of the earth.” And Rep. Rob Portman of Ohio added, “when you analyze all the data, there is a warming trend according to science, but the jury is out on the degree of how much is manmade.”

Another Tea Party candidate, Florida’s Marco Rubio echoed the same sentiments: I don’t think there’s any scientific evidence to justify it, he insisted, while also deriding his opponent, Charlie Crist, as a “believer in man-made global warming.”

The full slate of GOP candidates deny the existence of man made climate change. Some Republican's vying for office have even claimed that global warming is good for us. Last June, Ron Johnson claimed that global warming saved Wisconsin from turning into a glacier, saying he was “glad there’s global warming ... We’d be standing on top of a 200-foot thick glacier.”

Wisconsin's , Ron Johnson is a Republican candidate for US Senate, he has said uncategorically, “I absolutely do not believe in the science of man-caused climate change,” Johnson also called scientists and all those who believe in human causes of climate change, “crazy” and called the climate change theory “lunacy.” He achieved the pinnacle of climate change stupidy when he attributed this summer's flooding and forest fires to "sunspot activity."

GOP Senate Candidate John Raese is no better, he promotes a pre-industrial vision of science and he blames volcanoes for global warming. Raese has said he has “zero” [trust that] human activity is contributing to climate change.”

Climate change is ultimately a security issue. Denying anthropogenic climate change is a refutation of reality, and blaming volcanoes and sunspots for global warming is as ridiculous as Palin and Limbaugh blaming the BP oil spill in the gulf of Mexico on environmentalists.

These Republican candidates would be laughable if they did not have traction with the American public. The midterm elections are fast approaching and Republican lies are too dangerous to be ignored.


Related Posts
Environmental Issues in Six Key Senate Races
Climate Change is a Security Issue
Republican Political Finance and the 2010 Midterm Elections
Republican Strategy for the 2010 Midterms and Beyond
Tea Party Candidates and O'Donnell's Constitution Confusion
The Tea Party and Republican Obstructionism
Tea Party's Climate Change Denial
How to get Through to Climate Change Deniers
Deniers Deprived of Misinformation Strategy
The Dangerous Diversion of Climategate
Election 2010 Midterm Predictions
The 2010 Midterms and the Fight Against Climate Change
California's Proposition 23
Democrat's Chances in the 2010 Midterms
The Global Work Party and US Midterm Elections
Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
What is Wrong with the Right
Health Care Legislation and Implications for the Environment
Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
Van Jones Succumbs to Republican Pressure
Why We Did Not Get A Binding Agreement At COP15
Obama Needs the Senate to Succeed on Climate Change
Limbaugh Blames the Sierra Club for Oil Spill
Palin Blames Environmentalists for Oil Spill
Palin Renews Call for Offshore Oil Exploitation
Sarah Palin Belongs on Fox Not Discovery
Sarah Palin: Tea Party Queen but No Friend of Green
Palin is No Friend of Green
The New International System: The Role of Government

Republican Strategy for the 2010 Midterms and Beyond

Republicans may not have a plan for America in the 21st century and they most certainly do not have an environment strategy. However, conservatives do have a well financed, highly targeted strategy for defeating the Democrats in the November 2010 midterm elections and beyond.

The conservative approach is exemplified by Dick Morris, the Fox News spin master. Morris has a plan to control the Congress called Project 100.

Although Republicans only need to add 39 seats to gain control of the House of Representatives, the ambitious goal of Project 100 is for the Republicans to win 100 seats in this year's congressional elections. This type of mandate would definitively kill any hope of passing energy and climate legislation any time soon.

According to Jonathan Chait of The New Republic, the plan is much more ambitious. If Republicans win control of the House, they will not only stonewall the Democrats, they will also try to impeach President Obama. If they don't get the 67 Senate votes they need in 2010, and Obama wins a second term, “the House will vote to impeach him before he leaves office,” Chait wrote.

To help accomplish this goal, conservatives are targeting Democrats in constituencies where they are most vulnerable. The national committees and other outside donors are contributing heavily to influence the outcome of 50 key races. Project 100 is also selecting 50 "second-tier" races on which to focus their attack ads and other misinformation.

Tea party activists are working to defeat Democrats in the November elections, but they are already setting their sights on unseating several Republican senators in 2012. The targets are senators who have dared to work with the Obama administration, including Olympia Snowe and Richard Lugar.

Tea party activists are putting incumbents on notice that the bitter, divisive, anti-establishment sentiment defining this year’s politics will not end on Election Day 2010.

The stakes are high, a Republican victory on November 2nd 2010 will result in a legislative stalemate that is sure to ignore climate change.

Fueled by Tea Party outrage and propaganda machines like Fox News, the Republican strategy poses a very real threat to the environment.


Related Posts
Republican's Anti-Science Stance on Global Warming
Republican Political Finance and the 2010 Midterm Elections
Republicans Undermining Climate Legislation
Tea Party Candidates and O'Donnell's Constitution Confusion
The Tea Party and Republican Obstructionism
Tea Party's Climate Change Denial
Climate Change is a Security Issue
Environmental Issues in Six Key State Senate Races
California's Proposition 23
The 2010 Midterms and the Fight Against Climate Change
Democrat's Chances in the 2010 Midterms
Election 2010 Midterm Predictions
The Global Work Party and US Midterm Elections
The Passage of Health Care Legislation and Implications for the Environment
Green Stimulus Spending and Republican Opposition
Van Jones Succumbs to Republican Pressure
Why We Did Not Get A Binding Agreement At COP15
Obama Needs the Senate to Succeed on Climate Change
What is Wrong with the Right
Climate Scientist Cleared: Deniers Deprived of Misinformation Strategy
The Dangerous Diversion of Climategate
How to get Through to Climate Change Deniers
Limbaugh Blames the Sierra Club for Oil Spill
Palin Blames Environmentalists for Oil Spill
Palin Renews Call for Offshore Oil Exploitation
Sarah Palin Belongs on Fox Not Discovery
Sarah Palin: Tea Party Queen but No Friend of Green
Palin is No Friend of Green
The New International System: The Role of Government